Comments for Inside Conversation

Comment on The Conversation Triangle by kapaleev

kapaleev — Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:34:08 +0000

Interesting, I heard that the conversation triangle is about people, context, and content. In this model social object, connection and trust are contexts.

Comment on Enterprise 2.0, meet Social Media Monitoring by Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:44:02 +0000

Spot on with this write-up, I honestly believe that this website needs much more attention. I’ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the info!

Comment on Enterprise 2.0, meet Social Media Monitoring by Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:16:18 +0000

I really like looking through a post that can make men and women think. Also, many thanks for allowing for me to comment!

Comment on About Me by Butting In to the Conversation: PM Communication Tools | cazh1

Butting In to the Conversation: PM Communication Tools | cazh1 — Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:46:43 +0000

[...] McDonald and Lee White are conducting an interesting experiment on their blogs, crossposting a conversation about project [...]

Comment on Subjective Content Infrastructure by Rob Lytle

Rob Lytle — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:03:58 +0000

I like your “subjective” framework as a perspective (although I would argue that most traditional push marketing is hardly objective). The idea that social media is not simply about information, but about relevance, interpretation, and expansion is a nice way of seeing things.

For me, the key principle is the abilty to talk back and the power that the conversation has to change the nature of the interaction and the behavior of the communicators.

Comment on The Conversation Triangle by Rob Peters (@StandardofTrust)

Rob Peters (@StandardofTrust) — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:35:08 +0000

Lee:

Excellent Model for examining the on-line social interaction. Trust is the foundation of a quality relationship whether B2B or B2C.

The Standard of Trust tribe of businesses and professionals are passionate about implementing open industry standards for the capture and measurement of Relationship Capital (RC). RC is earned when one relationship entity (i.e. product/brand) keeps a commitment to another relationship entity (i.e. consumer). Each commitment or suite of commitments is negotiated between the entities.

Continued success!
-Rob

Comment on The Conversation Triangle by Diane Aull

Diane Aull — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:12:33 +0000

So true. What I see in so many business social media “conversations” is they focus first on the connection, getting all obsessed over whether they should be on Twitter, or Facebook, or whatever the Next Big Thing will be.

They give some thought to the Social Object, but usually only in terms of what THEY want to talk about. (Which seems more like a one-way dissertation than a two-way conversation…)

And they hardly ever consider the Trust aspect at all. Especially not that Trust has to go both ways. They want their customers to trust them, but when it’s time for the rubber to hit the road, do they really trust their customers? To the same extent they want their customers to trust them?

Comment on Community Architect by 5rit

5rit — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:08:45 +0000

my volunteer work is also a “community architect” but rather in this sense…

Community Architecture

can be simply defined as, “architecture carried out
with the active participation of the end-users” (Wates, Handbook 184)

source: http://www.mcgill.ca/files/mchg/chapter4.pdf

Comment on Community Architect by Driver

Driver — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:55:30 +0000

A worthwhile presentation is worth a comment. I am impressed. On to the next…

Comment on Community Architect by lengochanhu

lengochanhu — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:12:05 +0000

this term is really new to me. thanks for sharing!
do you have any more info on this Community Architecture?